Skip to main content

On selecting an option from the following Language drop-down list, the language of the content will change accordingly.

    Text Size:  Smaller text size Medium text size Larger text size  | 

    Contrast Scheme:  Standard View High Contrast View  | 

    Screen Reader
    SLIC, Socio-Legal Information Center.
    • Mail
    • Print
    • PDF

    National Consultation on Criminal Justice Reform, New Delhi 2007 - Part 6

    Published on: 12/12/2014

    The National Consultation on Criminal Justice Reform has been organised by Human Rights Law Network from 2 June 2014 to 3 June 2014 in New Delhi. Criminal Justice One of our main focus areas is work inside the prison, as we believe in corrections via jails and prisons, which can only be understood by reviewing prison conditions and capital punishment laws. We work with progressive prison administrators and police personnel to set up legal aid clinics in prisons with the objective of representing indigent under trials. Since 2002, we have been instrumental in setting up a legal aid mechanism for prisoners in Delhi. Though the Indian judiciary makes use of death penalty, HRLN strongly believes in the abolition of the death penalty. Issues of Concern • Prison Conditions • Practice of Death Penalty • Legislative, Executive and Judicial Expansion of Police Powers Major Impacts We have represented the poor and marginalized and have highlighted that a large number of prisoners are kept in prisons without being produced in the courts on the dates fixed for their trial or in connection with remand. (See: Rajendra Bidkar and Ors Vs. The State of Maharashtra) Our team is at the forefront in regard to its reform work in prisons, playing a pivotal role in implementation of the Mulla Committee recommendations and the DK Basu guidelines layed down by the Supreme Court. Strongly condemning custodial torture and violence, our team in Mumbai documented ten cases of custodial violence in Maharashtra over a period of two months. Subsequently, the court asked for magisterial enquiry report. Our team went on to submit guidelines to be followed for the prevention of such occurences in the future. Another petition in the Bombay High Court asked for improving the visiting condition of prisoners and their families (See: Kavita Kaushik vs State of Maharashtra). Another landmark case decided in the Bombay High Court resulted in the release of hundreds of under-trial prisoners, who had languished in prisons for far beyond the maximum term of their punishment, due to slow court procedures. (See: Shabnam Miniwaalla Vs. State of Maharashtra). However, statistics still demonstrate that 70% of India’s prison inmates are under trials and much remains to be done to improve the criminal justice system of the country.

    Contact Us

    HUMAN RIGHTS LAW NETWORK

    Socio-Legal Information Center, 576, Masjid Road, Jungpura, New Delhi - 110014

    +91-11-24374501, +91-11-24379855, +91-11-24374502(Fax)

    contact@hrln.org

    Follow us on

    • facebook
    • google plus
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram
    • youtube
    Back To Top