Skip to main content

On selecting an option from the following Language drop-down list, the language of the content will change accordingly.

    Text Size:  Smaller text size Medium text size Larger text size  | 

    Contrast Scheme:  Standard View High Contrast View  | 

    Screen Reader
    SLIC, Socio-Legal Information Center.
    • Mail
    • Print
    • PDF

    Sultana Begum V/s. state Of Punjab &Ors (2015) 16 SCC 212

    Date : 12/05/2016

    The instant case came up after the High Court quashed the criminal charges and proceedings against the accused and the moot point was whether the criminal proceedings can be quashed in entirety or only partial correction can be made. The Hon’ble court held that quashing of orders of framing charges is correct but quashing the proceedings before the trial Judge by the High Court is incorrect. The high court ought to have remanded back the case to the trial judge with a direction to examine the matter afresh in accordance with law with regard to framing of charge.

    TP_2015_16_scc_212_216_debashishmohanta_hrlnorg_20170908_174142 (1)
    0

    Contact Us

    HUMAN RIGHTS LAW NETWORK

    Socio-Legal Information Center, 576, Masjid Road, Jungpura, New Delhi - 110014

    +91-11-24374501, +91-11-24379855, +91-11-24374502(Fax)

    contact@hrln.org

    Follow us on

    • facebook
    • google plus
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram
    • youtube
    Back To Top