Skip to main content

On selecting an option from the following Language drop-down list, the language of the content will change accordingly.

Text Size:  Smaller text size Medium text size Larger text size  | 

Contrast Scheme:  Standard View High Contrast View  | 

Screen Reader
SLIC, Socio-Legal Information Center.
  • Mail
  • Print
  • PDF

2003: PUCL vs Union of India and others, Civil Writ Petition 196 of 2001

Date : 02/05/2003

Supreme Court hearings on the right to food (PUCL vs Union of India and others, Civil Writ Petition 196 of 2001) have been held at regular intervals since April 2001. Though the judgement is still awaited, interim orders have been passed from time to time.

Order of 19 August 2003

In this hearing, the bench asked the petitioner to meet representatives of GoI to discuss the fourth report submitted by the commissioners. The parties were asked to report back to the court in five weeks with the results of the meeting.

Order of 2 May 2003

SGRY scheme to be doubled for an interim period of three months (May – July)
Famine codes will be binding in the months of May, June and July. However, if better measures are incorporated in other schemes, these may be implemented instead.
Government of India to clarify its response to the Abhijit Sen Committee report by August 8, 2003.
Government of India has to evolve a system of ensuring that all poor families are identified as BPL.
Licences of ration shop dealers to be cancelled if they (i) do not open on time, (ii) overcharge, (iii) retain ration cards, (iv) make false entries in BPL cards, or (v) engage in black marketing.
BPL households are to be permitted to buy grain in instalments.
The following groups to be given Antyodaya cards:
(1) Aged, infirm, disabled, destitute men and women, pregnant and lactating destitute women;
(2) widows and other single women with no regular support;
(3) old persons (aged 60 or above) with no regular support and no assured means of subsistence;
(4) households with a disabled adult and no assured means of subsistence;
(5) households where due to old age, lack of physical or mental fitness, social customs, need to care for a disabled, or other reasons, no adult member is available to engage in gainful employment outside the house; and
(6) primitive tribes.
States that have not implemented the order on mid-day meal scheme to immediately start providing mid-day meals in at least 25 % of the districts (with priority to poorest districts).

Orderof-2-May-2003
0

Related Articles

Slideshow - Related Post

Contact Us

HUMAN RIGHTS LAW NETWORK

Socio-Legal Information Center, 576, Masjid Road, Jungpura, New Delhi - 110014

+91-11-24374501, +91-11-24379855, +91-11-24374502(Fax)

contact@hrln.org

Follow us on

  • facebook
  • google plus
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • instagram
  • youtube
Back To Top

We need your help!

Human rights violations are on the rise across the country. In order to respond to the crisis, we need to strengthen our network. Support us by committing to donate Rs. 200 upwards per month through our secure payment system. Indian Nationals/Organizations/Charities can use various payment methods like Debit Cards, Credit Cards, Internet Banking, other payment gateways to donate to us.