In the news: Bombay high court permits surrogate mother to terminate her 24-week-old pregnancy
The Bombay high court permitted a surrogate mother to terminate her 24-week-old pregnancy after the foetus was found to have multiple cardiac abnormalities. The HC was hearing a petition filed by a Pune-based woman, seeking permission to terminate her 24-week pregnancy.
According to the petition, the woman had entered into an agreement with a Pune-based couple to conceive their baby through assisted reproductive technology. The baby was conceived but later, during a routine check-up, it was learnt that the foetus had multiple cardiac abnormalities. The woman along with the parents then approached the high court seeking permission to terminate the pregnancy as it had gone beyond the 20-week period. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act prohibits abortion of pregnancy beyond the 20-week period unless a direction to that effect is given by a high court after considering the report from an expert medical team of any state-run hospital.
Last week, the woman was examined by a medical team of the B.J. Medical College and Sassoon General Hospital in Pune, which submitted a report noting that clinical examination revealed multiple cardiac abnormalities in the foetus. The report further noted that if the baby was born, it would require multiple surgeries with high morbidity and mortality. “The medical team has therefore opined that the pregnancy may be terminated,” the court said in its order.
On Wednesday, when the petition was heard, Justice Bharti Dangre said the case was “peculiar” in nature as the petitioner was a surrogate mother and the baby had been conceived through assisted reproductive technology. The court then directed that the intended parents appear before it to accord consent. “As directed, the intended father appeared before court on Friday and gave consent.
Slideshow - Related Post
09/01/2019Read: Critique of Transgender Bill 2018
29/12/2018Recent updates from the Kashmir Unit
13/12/2018Child marriage was stopped in Rajasthan
26/11/2017Anjali Anand vs. State of M.P. and Others
22/10/2017Case of domestic abuse
06/07/2017Minors granted refugee status by UNHCR
16/07/2016Petition filed for compensation for land
16/07/2016Lack of emergency facilities at AIIMS Patna
13/05/2016Case of Domestic Violence in Itanagar
17/07/2015Implementation of the NALSA Judgment
20/04/2013National Consultation on Prison Legal Aid
02/04/2012Forced Sterilization and Family Planning
03/02/2012SEEMA LEPCHA vs STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS
06/04/2011Bhalaswa Lok Shakti Manch Vs GNCT Of Delhi
14/01/2011HIV +ve pregnant woman denied treatment
16/07/2010Hiralal M. Khatik v. Central Railway
16/07/2010HRLN interventions in homeless shelters
16/07/2010Prajwala v. Union of India
16/07/2010State vs. Abdul Majid
16/07/2010AM* vs. Government of Haryana
16/07/2010Mr. Anthony Omondi Osino vs. FRRO
27/01/2010Writ Petition © No. 196 of 2001
14/07/2005Amit Kumar Jain vs. State of Rajasthan
02/02/2005Pratap Singh vs State of Jharkhand and Anr